{"id":56063,"date":"2026-09-02T10:34:02","date_gmt":"2026-09-02T08:34:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/?post_type=notable_case&p=56063"},"modified":"2026-09-02T10:34:02","modified_gmt":"2026-09-02T08:34:02","slug":"use-of-teen-in-porn-content-contracts","status":"publish","type":"notable_case","link":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/de\/notable_case\/use-of-teen-in-porn-content-contracts\/","title":{"rendered":"A Content Provider v. Contractual Counterparty: Use of “Teen” in Porn and Adult Content Contracts"},"content":{"rendered":"
We advised on the review of a contract concerning the delivery of porn and other adult content, focusing on the interpretation of the term “teen”. A quality dispute arose where content featuring performers aged around 30 was marketed and delivered under a “teen” category based on their outward appearance.<\/p>\n

The matter required assessing whether this practice was compatible with the contractual wording and applicable legal standards, in particular with regard to classification, accuracy of description, and age protection and compliance requirements.<\/p>\n

From a practical perspective, the review also required extensive examination of the underlying content, which led to the somewhat unusual task of explaining to internal IT why large amounts of porn had been accessed during office hours in the course of legal analysis of the case.<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>","protected":false},"featured_media":56064,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"notable-cases-category":[],"class_list":["post-56063","notable_case","type-notable_case","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t