N\u00fcrnberg Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi\u2019nin (OLG N\u00fcrnberg) 23 Aral\u0131k 2019 tarihli ara karar\u0131nda, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 amac\u0131yla Macaristan\u2019a nakledilmesinin, cezaevi ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin belirli g\u00fcvencelerin sa\u011flanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 tutulabilece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
S\u00f6z konusu davada, Almanya\u2019da tutuklu bulunan bir Macar vatanda\u015f\u0131, cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 amac\u0131yla Macaristan\u2019a nakledilmesine itiraz etmi\u015ftir. M\u00fcvekkilin savunmas\u0131nda, Macaristan\u2019daki ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131nda ya\u015fanan a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 kalabal\u0131k nedeniyle naklin kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil edece\u011fi ve bu nedenle reddedilebilece\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Avrupa Birli\u011fi i\u00e7erisinde, \u00fcye devletler aras\u0131nda ceza mahk\u00fbmiyetlerinin infaz\u0131na y\u00f6nelik nakil i\u015flemleri, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00fcven ilkesi gere\u011fince kural olarak kapsaml\u0131 bir esas incelemesi yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmektedir. Bununla birlikte mahkeme, savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc itirazlar\u0131na ra\u011fmen, Macaristan\u2019daki cezaevi ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin endi\u015feleri dikkate alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn Macaristan\u2019a naklinin, Macar makamlar\u0131n\u0131n cezaevi ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin yeterli g\u00fcvence sa\u011flamas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 tutulabilece\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa, Macaristan\u2019daki cezaevi ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n fiil\u00ee durumunun ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talimat\u0131n\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. Karara g\u00f6re Alman makamlar\u0131n\u0131n, Macar makamlar\u0131nca sa\u011flanacak g\u00fcvenceleri esas alarak, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn nakil sonras\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131la\u015faca\u011f\u0131 somut cezaevi ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
Dosya, Avrupa Birli\u011fi i\u00e7erisindeki h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc nakillerinin normal ko\u015fullarda b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00fcvene dayal\u0131 ve rutin \u015fekilde i\u015fleyen s\u00fcre\u00e7ler olmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6zel \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Mahkemenin de belirtti\u011fi \u00fczere, bir \u00dcye Devletin ba\u015fka bir \u00dcye Devletin hukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc standartlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 rutin olarak sorgulamas\u0131, \u00dcye Devletler aras\u0131ndaki kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00fcven ilkesini zedeleyebilir.\nAncak bu davada, hukuk b\u00fcromuz taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen hukuki arg\u00fcmanlar ve \u00f6zellikle Macaristan\u2019\u0131n cezaevi ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin belirli raporlar\u0131 Avrupa Konseyi\u2019ne sunmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, Macaristan\u2019daki ko\u015fullar\u0131n istisnai olarak esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesinin gerekli oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":55356,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"notable-cases-category":[],"class_list":["post-55355","notable_case","type-notable_case","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t