{"id":55964,"date":"2026-08-19T17:15:54","date_gmt":"2026-08-19T15:15:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/?post_type=notable_case&#038;p=55964"},"modified":"2026-08-19T17:15:54","modified_gmt":"2026-08-19T15:15:54","slug":"challenging-arbitral-jurisdiction-before-vienna-courts","status":"publish","type":"notable_case","link":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/","title":{"rendered":"Belediye v. Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf: Viyana Ticaret Mahkemesi Nezdinde Tahkim Yetkisine \u0130tiraz"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Macaristan\u2019daki bir belediyeyi, devam eden tahkim yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 tespit ve ihtiyati tedbir talebiyle Viyana Ticaret Mahkemesi nezdinde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen yarg\u0131lamada temsil ettik.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Davan\u0131n merkezinde, hakem heyetinin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k \u00fczerinde yarg\u0131 yetkisine sahip olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorusu yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tahkim yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na paralel olarak, hakem heyetinin yetkisiz oldu\u011funun tespit edilmesi ve tahkim s\u00fcrecinin devam\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesi amac\u0131yla mahkeme nezdinde dava a\u00e7t\u0131k.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Dosya, hakem heyetleri ile devlet mahkemeleri aras\u0131ndaki yetki ili\u015fkisi ve tahkim yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla menfi tespit talebinde bulunulup bulunulamayaca\u011f\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan temel hukuki meseleleri g\u00fcndeme getirmi\u015ftir. S\u00fcre\u00e7, tahkim stratejisi ile Avusturya mahkemeleri \u00f6n\u00fcndeki yarg\u0131laman\u0131n dikkatli bi\u00e7imde koordine edilmesini gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Yarg\u0131lama, hem mahkeme davas\u0131n\u0131 hem de tahkim s\u00fcrecini kapsayan kapsaml\u0131 bir sulh anla\u015fmas\u0131yla sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015f ve uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ticari a\u00e7\u0131dan uygulanabilir bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulmu\u015ftur.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":55965,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"notable-cases-category":[],"class_list":["post-55964","notable_case","type-notable_case","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.0.1 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"We represented a Hungarian municipality in proceedings before the Commercial Court of Vienna seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against ongoing arbitral proceedings. The case centred on whether the arbitral tribunal had jurisdiction at all. In parallel to the arbitration, we initiated court proceedings to obtain a declaration that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction and to prevent\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"google-site-verification\" content=\"0ZCEmvP3Jss6hqLOqbcJenXmykbTzE02xFLyiDZx5i8\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.0.1\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/notable_case\\\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/notable_case\\\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"A Municipality v. Arbitral Proceedings: Challenging Jurisdiction Before the Vienna Commercial Court\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/notable_case\\\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A Municipality v. Arbitral Proceedings: Challenging Jurisdiction Before the Vienna Commercial Court\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"NZP NAGY LEGAL\",\"description\":\"Deutsches und Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/cropped-nzp_logo_w.png\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/notable_case\\\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\\\/#organizationLogo\",\"width\":270,\"height\":87},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/notable_case\\\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\\\/#organizationLogo\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/notable_case\\\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/notable_case\\\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\\\/\",\"name\":\"A Municipality v. Arbitral Proceedings: Challenging Jurisdiction Before the Vienna Commercial Court | NZP NAGY LEGAL\",\"description\":\"We represented a Hungarian municipality in proceedings before the Commercial Court of Vienna seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against ongoing arbitral proceedings. The case centred on whether the arbitral tribunal had jurisdiction at all. In parallel to the arbitration, we initiated court proceedings to obtain a declaration that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction and to prevent\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr-TR\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/notable_case\\\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/KepNT5.jpg\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/notable_case\\\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\\\/#mainImage\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1280},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/notable_case\\\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\\\/#mainImage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-19T17:15:54+02:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-19T17:15:54+02:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"NZP NAGY LEGAL\",\"description\":\"Deutsches und Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr-TR\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nzp.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Bir Belediye ile Tahkim Davas\u0131: Viyana Ticaret Mahkemesi Nezdinde Yarg\u0131 Yetkisine \u0130tiraz | NZP NAGY LEGAL","description":"Viyana Ticaret Mahkemesi nezdinde, devam eden bir tahkim davas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 tespit ve ihtiyati tedbir talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada bir Macar belediyesini temsil ettik. Dava, tahkim heyetinin yetki sahibi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusuna odaklan\u0131yordu. Tahkim s\u00fcrecine paralel olarak, tahkim heyetinin yetkisiz oldu\u011funa dair bir karar al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131dakilerin \u00f6nlenmesi amac\u0131yla mahkeme davas\u0131 ba\u015flatt\u0131k:","canonical_url":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"google-site-verification":"0ZCEmvP3Jss6hqLOqbcJenXmykbTzE02xFLyiDZx5i8","miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/#listItem","name":"A Municipality v. Arbitral Proceedings: Challenging Jurisdiction Before the Vienna Commercial Court"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"A Municipality v. Arbitral Proceedings: Challenging Jurisdiction Before the Vienna Commercial Court","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr#listItem","name":"Home"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/#organization","name":"NZP NAGY LEGAL","description":"Deutsches und Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht","url":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-nzp_logo_w.png","@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/#organizationLogo","width":270,"height":87},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/#organizationLogo"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/","name":"A Municipality v. Arbitral Proceedings: Challenging Jurisdiction Before the Vienna Commercial Court | NZP NAGY LEGAL","description":"We represented a Hungarian municipality in proceedings before the Commercial Court of Vienna seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against ongoing arbitral proceedings. The case centred on whether the arbitral tribunal had jurisdiction at all. In parallel to the arbitration, we initiated court proceedings to obtain a declaration that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction and to prevent","inLanguage":"tr-TR","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/#breadcrumblist"},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/KepNT5.jpg","@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/#mainImage","width":1920,"height":1280},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/#mainImage"},"datePublished":"2026-08-19T17:15:54+02:00","dateModified":"2026-08-19T17:15:54+02:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/","name":"NZP NAGY LEGAL","description":"Deutsches und Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht","inLanguage":"tr-TR","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/#organization"}}]}},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"55964","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"WebPage","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"schemas":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":{"subject":"","preview":"","content":""},"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"created":"2026-08-19 15:11:54","updated":"2026-08-19 15:42:59","seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tA Municipality v. Arbitral Proceedings: Challenging Jurisdiction Before the Vienna Commercial Court\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr"},{"label":"A Municipality v. Arbitral Proceedings: Challenging Jurisdiction Before the Vienna Commercial Court","link":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/notable_case\/viyana-mahkemeleri-nezdinde-tahkim-yargi-yetkisine-itiraz-edilmesi\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/notable_case\/55964","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/notable_case"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/notable_case"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/55965"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55964"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"notable-cases-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/notable-cases-category?post=55964"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}