Almanya Federal Adalet Divan\u0131, en son ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6n\u00fcm noktas\u0131 niteli\u011findeki ilke karar\u0131nda, as\u0131l otoyol ge\u00e7i\u015f \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmemesi durumunda, Macaristan\u2019da Ulusal Ge\u00e7i\u015f \u00dccreti \u00d6deme Hizmetleri A.\u015e. taraf\u0131ndan uygulanan art\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ge\u00e7i\u015f \u00fccreti ile buna ili\u015fkin tahsilat masraflar\u0131n\u0131n da ilke olarak Alman mahkemeleri taraf\u0131ndan ara\u00e7 sahiplerine kar\u015f\u0131 h\u00fckmedilebilece\u011fine h\u00fckmetti.
\nAra\u00e7 sahibinin sorumlulu\u011fu Alman hukukunda bilinmeyen bir kavram de\u011fildir ve otoyol ge\u00e7i\u015f \u00fccretinin \u00f6nceden \u00f6denmemesi durumunda uygulanan cezai nitelikteki ek \u00fccret, ne \u00f6z\u00fc bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ne de \u2014 \u015fu an itibar\u0131yla \u2014 tutar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, \u201cordre public\u201d, yani Almanya\u2019n\u0131n i\u00e7 kamu d\u00fczenini ihlal etmemektedir.<\/p>\n
Bununla birlikte, National Toll Payment Services Plc. taraf\u0131ndan taraf\u0131ndan otoyol ge\u00e7i\u015f \u00fccretlerinin \u00f6denmesi i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar daha \u00f6nce icra edilememi\u015fti; zira Macar hukukunun uygulanabilirli\u011fi nedeniyle \u2014 di\u011fer davalarda da savundu\u011fumuz gibi \u2014 Macar hukukuna g\u00f6re bu t\u00fcr durumlarda borcun euro cinsinden \u00f6denmesi talebinde bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilir olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi gerekiyordu.<\/p>\n
G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fcze g\u00f6re, bu t\u00fcr bir i\u015flem Macar forint\u0131 cinsinden tahsil edilen \u00fccretler s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in Macar hukuku kapsam\u0131nda da kabul edilemez. Bu t\u00fcr bir \u00f6nlem, \u00f6ncelikle Macar vatanda\u015f\u0131 olmayan ki\u015fileri etkiledi\u011fi i\u00e7in, Avrupa Birli\u011fi hukukuyla da ba\u011fda\u015fmaz; zira bu t\u00fcr bir \u00f6nlem, Avrupa Birli\u011fi\u2019nin t\u00fcm vatanda\u015flar\u0131na e\u015fit muamele ilkesini ihlal eder.
\nSon olarak, Ulusal \u00dccretli Ge\u00e7i\u015f Hizmetleri A.\u015e. taraf\u0131ndan \u2014 genellikle alacak tahsilat \u015firketleri arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla \u2014 iletilen talepler temelinde a\u00e7\u0131lan davalara kar\u015f\u0131 savunma yapman\u0131n h\u00e2l\u00e2 tavsiye edildi\u011fini vurgulamak \u00f6nemlidir; elbette, uzmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zla size destek olmaktan memnuniyet duyar\u0131z ve her zaman hizmetinizdeyiz.<\/p>\n
Yukar\u0131da bahsedilen mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n tam metnine a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki ba\u011flant\u0131dan ula\u015f\u0131labilir: Benzer sorunlarla m\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131yorsunuz? L\u00fctfen bizimle ileti\u015fime ge\u00e7in.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In its most recent landmark decision of principle, the German Federal Court of Justice held that, in the event of non-payment of the original motorway toll, the increased toll imposed in Hungary by the National Toll Payment Services Plc., as well as the related collection costs, may in principle also be awarded by German courts […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":55348,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55347","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t
\nhttps:\/\/www.bundesgerichtshof.de\/SharedDocs\/Termine\/DE\/Termine\/XIIZR7-22.html<\/a><\/p>\n