E-Delil \u00f6nerilerinin amac\u0131, AB \u00fcye devletleri aras\u0131nda ceza hukuku alan\u0131ndaki i\u015fbirli\u011fini g\u00fc\u00e7lendirmektir. Ancak bu hedefe ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131p ula\u015f\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2l\u00e2 belirsizdir. Teklifin sunulmas\u0131ndan alt\u0131 ay sonra dahi taraflar, gelecekte bir AB d\u00fczenlemesine d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015febilecek sistemin nas\u0131l \u015fekillendirilece\u011fi konusunda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya\u015famaktad\u0131r. Ulusal s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n \u00f6tesinde delillerin elde edilmesi ve g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 konu alan teklif, Aral\u0131k 2018\u2019de k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede ivme kazanm\u0131\u015f, ancak daha sonra Konseyin tutumu nedeniyle deste\u011fini kaybetmi\u015ftir. Almanya\u2019n\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu yedi \u00fcye devlet, AB adalet bakanlar\u0131n\u0131n daha \u00f6nce \u00fczerinde uzla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 genel yakla\u015f\u0131ma kar\u015f\u0131 oy kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. D\u00f6nemin Almanya Federal Adalet ve T\u00fcketicinin Korunmas\u0131 Bakan\u0131 Katarina Barley, hedefin do\u011fru oldu\u011funu, ancak bu d\u00fczenlemeyle temel haklar\u0131n kapsaml\u0131 bi\u00e7imde korunmas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Almanya\u2019n\u0131n teklifi onaylayabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u201cd\u00f6rt g\u00f6z ilkesi\u201d \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r: Temel haklara hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 m\u00fcdahalelerin \u00f6nlenebilmesi i\u00e7in, talepte bulunan \u00fcye devletin verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n, karar\u0131 uygulayacak \u00fcye devlet taraf\u0131ndan da incelenebilmesi gerekir. Konseyin mevcut yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ise buna yaln\u0131zca k\u0131smen imk\u00e2n tan\u0131makta ve uygulayan devlete sadece s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 durumlarda dar kapsaml\u0131 bir inceleme yetkisi vermektedir. Hukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc standartlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bu tart\u0131\u015fmalar ve Avrupa Birli\u011fi Adalet Divan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n (ABAD) yak\u0131n tarihli kararlar\u0131, \u00fcye devletler aras\u0131ndaki kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00fcvenin h\u00e2len belirli s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu g\u00f6stermektedir. Bu nedenle bu alanda ancak yava\u015f bir ilerleme beklenebilir. Birgit Sippel (SPD) de di\u011fer baz\u0131 isimlerle birlikte, Avrupa Birli\u011fi\u2019nin \u0130\u015fleyi\u015fi Hakk\u0131nda Antla\u015fma\u2019n\u0131n (AB\u0130HA) 82. maddesine dayanan yetki konusunda teredd\u00fctlerini dile getirmi\u015ftir. Sippel, \u00f6zellikle Avrupa Soru\u015fturma Emri\u2019nin 2017 y\u0131l\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle yeni d\u00fczenlemenin sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 ilave fayday\u0131 sorgulamaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca b\u00f6yle bir d\u00fczenlemenin, bir delil ibraz emrinin hukuka uygunlu\u011funun de\u011ferlendirilmesini \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere b\u0131rakmas\u0131 nedeniyle ceza hukukunun \u00f6zelle\u015ftirilmesi riskini ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmektedir. <\/p>\n
D\u00fczenlemenin veri koruma bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da \u00f6nemli sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furmas\u0131 beklenmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca ki\u015filerin hukuki ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131ndan etkin bi\u00e7imde yararlanabilmelerinin yeterince g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131 da belirsizdir. Bu nedenle May\u0131s ay\u0131nda yap\u0131lacak Avrupa Parlamentosu se\u00e7imlerinden \u00f6nce bir uzla\u015fmaya var\u0131lmas\u0131 olduk\u00e7a \u015f\u00fcpheli g\u00f6r\u00fcnmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla E-Delil konusu bir sonraki yasama d\u00f6neminde de g\u00fcndemde kalacakt\u0131r.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Greater criminal-law cooperation between EU Member States is the objective of the E-Evidence proposals. Whether this objective can be achieved, however, remains uncertain. Half a year after the proposal was introduced, the parties involved are still disputing the design of what may become a future EU regulation. The proposal, which concerns the securing of evidence […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":55494,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55493","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t