Avrupa Birli\u011fi Adalet Divan\u0131, k\u0131sa s\u00fcre \u00f6nce A.Y. ba\u015f harfleriyle tan\u0131mlanan bir san\u0131\u011fa ili\u015fkin davada (asl\u0131nda MOL ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 Zsolt Hern\u00e1di davas\u0131) karar\u0131n\u0131 yay\u0131mlad\u0131.
\nKarara g\u00f6re, bir Avrupa Tutuklama Emri\u2019nin yerine getirilmesi ve aranan ki\u015finin ba\u015fka bir \u00dcye Devlete teslim edilmesi, yaln\u0131zca Avrupa Tutuklama Emri ve \u00dcye Devletler Aras\u0131ndaki Teslim Usullerine \u0130li\u015fkin 2002\/584 say\u0131l\u0131 Konsey \u00c7er\u00e7eve Karar\u0131\u2019nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilen gerek\u00e7elerle reddedilebilir.<\/p>\n
Davan\u0131n arka plan\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir: 2015 y\u0131l\u0131nda Zagreb \u0130l Mahkemesi (\u017dupanijski Sud u Zagrebu), san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda H\u0131rvatistan\u2019da bir Avrupa Tutuklama Emri \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Macaristan\u2019da y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen olduk\u00e7a s\u0131ra d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir \u00f6zel kovu\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ad\u0131, tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmesi talep edilen potansiyel bir \u015f\u00fcpheli olarak g\u00fcndeme gelmi\u015fti. Macar mahkemesinin Avrupa Birli\u011fi Adalet Divan\u0131\u2019na y\u00f6neltti\u011fi soruya g\u00f6re, bu t\u00fcr durumlarda \u2014 Temel Haklar \u015eart\u0131 ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan haklar da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u2014 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fka bir \u00dcye Devlete teslim edilip edilemeyece\u011fi veya bunun ayn\u0131 fiilden dolay\u0131 iki kez yarg\u0131lanmama (ne bis in idem) ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmal\u0131yd\u0131.<\/p>\n
Ancak Mahkeme, ne bis in idem ilkesinin sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 koruman\u0131n, ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda yaln\u0131zca tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmi\u015f ki\u015fileri kapsamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu davada Avrupa Tutuklama Emri\u2019nin yerine getirilmesinin veya ki\u015finin teslim edilmesinin reddedilmesi i\u00e7in herhangi bir dayanak bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
Karar\u0131n ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7esine Macarca olarak buradan ula\u015f\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n
Avrupa boyutu bulunan bir ceza davas\u0131yla ilgili ba\u015fka sorular\u0131n\u0131z m\u0131 var? Bizimle ileti\u015fime ge\u00e7in, sorular\u0131n\u0131z\u0131 yan\u0131tlayal\u0131m.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The Court of Justice of the European Union has recently published its decision in the case concerning an unknown defendant identified by the initials A.Y. (in reality, the case concerning Zsolt Hern\u00e1di in relation to MOL). According to the judgment, execution of a European Arrest Warrant and surrender of the requested person to another Member […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":55512,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[139],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55511","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-en"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t