{"id":55711,"date":"2015-01-03T11:27:01","date_gmt":"2015-01-03T10:27:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/?p=55711"},"modified":"2026-08-11T11:31:32","modified_gmt":"2026-08-11T09:31:32","slug":"prohibition-of-tie-in-clauses-in-gmbh-managing-director-contracts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nzp.de\/tr\/gmbh-genel-mudur-sozlesmelerinde-baglayici-hukumlerin-yasaklanmasi\/","title":{"rendered":"GmbH Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrlerinin Hizmet S\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde Ba\u011flant\u0131 H\u00fck\u00fcmleri"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ba\u011flant\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, genel m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin s\u00fcresini \u015firketteki genel m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck g\u00f6revinin devam\u0131na ba\u011flar. Basit\u00e7e ifade etmek gerekirse, genel m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn g\u00f6revden al\u0131nmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde hizmet ili\u015fkisinin de sona ermesi ama\u00e7lan\u0131r. Bu t\u00fcr h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi konusunda \u00f6ncelikle belirtmek gerekir ki, kural olarak bunlar\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na engel bulunmamaktad\u0131r ve hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlere yer verilebilir. Bununla birlikte, emredici kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uyulmas\u0131 gerekir.
\nSaarbr\u00fccken Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesinin 8 May\u0131s 2013 tarihli \u2013 1 U 154\/12 \u2013 43 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 bu bak\u0131mdan dikkat \u00e7ekicidir. Mahkeme, s\u00f6z konusu kararda genel m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde yer alan ba\u011flant\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc ge\u00e7erli kabul etmi\u015ftir. Ancak somut olay\u0131n ay\u0131rt edici \u00f6zelli\u011fi, genel m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn \u00fccretini 31 Aral\u0131k 2010 tarihine kadar almaya devam etmi\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle mahkemenin, ba\u011flant\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Alman Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun (BGB) 622. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen emredici ihbar s\u00fcrelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 meselesini de\u011ferlendirmesi gerekmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Konuya ili\u015fkin i\u00e7tihat incelendi\u011finde, mahkemelerin bu meseleyi hen\u00fcz tatmin edici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bununla birlikte, \u00f6zellikle ayn\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme metninin birden fazla genel m\u00fcd\u00fcr i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda, s\u00f6zle\u015fme haz\u0131rlan\u0131rken BGB\u2019nin 622. maddesinin de dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu durumda ba\u011flant\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc, BGB\u2019nin 307. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 1. bendi uyar\u0131nca i\u00e7erik denetimine de tabi tutulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bununla birlikte, emredici ihbar s\u00fcrelerinin uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir istisna bulunmaktad\u0131r: BGB\u2019nin 626. maddesi anlam\u0131nda \u201chakl\u0131 neden\u201d mevcutsa, ihbar s\u00fcresine uyulmaks\u0131z\u0131n fesih m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu nedenle, hakl\u0131 nedene dayanan g\u00f6revden alma ile di\u011fer nedenlere dayanan g\u00f6revden alma hallerinin birbirinden ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Uygulamada bu, bir ba\u011flant\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki durumlarda ge\u00e7erli olabilece\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelir:
\n1. g\u00f6revden alma nedeni, BGB\u2019nin 626. maddesi uyar\u0131nca hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ihbar s\u00fcresine uyulmaks\u0131z\u0131n feshedilmesini hakl\u0131 k\u0131lan nedenle \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyorsa; veya
\n2. di\u011fer t\u00fcm durumlarda, BGB\u2019nin 622. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ola\u011fan ihbar s\u00fcresine uyuluyorsa.<\/p>\n

S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin hukuka uygun \u015fekilde haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar konusunda size dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k sunmaktan memnuniyet duyar\u0131z.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tie-in clauses make the duration of a managing director\u2019s service agreement dependent on their corporate office. Put simply: if the managing director is removed from office, their employment or service relationship is also intended to end. To give the answer on admissibility from the outset: in principle, there is nothing to prevent the use of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":55712,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[139],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55711","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-en"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t