\u0130ki san\u0131k, Arnsberg yak\u0131nlar\u0131ndaki B 229 karayolunda yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir motorlu ara\u00e7 yar\u0131\u015f\u0131 d\u00fczenleme konusunda anla\u015ft\u0131. Yar\u0131\u015f s\u0131ras\u0131nda, yar\u0131\u015fa kat\u0131lmayan ba\u015fka bir ara\u00e7la \u00e7arp\u0131\u015fma meydana geldi. Bu ara\u00e7ta be\u015f ki\u015fi bulunuyordu. Yolculardan biri kaza sonucunda hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti; di\u011ferleri ise baz\u0131lar\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r olmak \u00fczere yaraland\u0131.<\/p>\n
Arnsberg B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi ilk karar\u0131nda, kazaya neden olan arac\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc san\u0131k H.\u2019yi, \u00f6l\u00fcme yol a\u00e7an kas\u0131tl\u0131 trafik g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye sokma su\u00e7undan \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l dokuz ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131rd\u0131. Yar\u0131\u015fa kat\u0131lan ancak \u00e7arp\u0131\u015fmaya kar\u0131\u015fmayan di\u011fer arac\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc san\u0131k P.\u2019ye ise yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 motorlu ara\u00e7 yar\u0131\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7undan dokuz ay ertelenmi\u015f hapis cezas\u0131 verildi.<\/p>\n
Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine dava Alman Federal Yarg\u0131tay\u0131\u2019na (Bundesgerichtshof \u2013 BGH) ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131. Mahkeme, ikinci san\u0131k P. hakk\u0131nda verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc bozarak dosyay\u0131, d\u00f6rt ayr\u0131 taksirle \u00f6l\u00fcme ve taksirle yaralanmaya neden olma su\u00e7lar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da de\u011ferlendirilmek \u00fczere geri g\u00f6nderdi.<\/p>\n
Bu dava, Alman Federal Yarg\u0131tay\u0131\u2019na Alman Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun yeni 315d maddesine ili\u015fkin temel hukuki meseleleri a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturma f\u0131rsat\u0131 verdi. \u00d6zellikle \u201cyar\u0131\u015f\u201d kavram\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131 ile di\u011fer yar\u0131\u015fmac\u0131lar\u0131n do\u011frudan neden oldu\u011fu somut tehlikelerin hangi ko\u015fullarda di\u011fer kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lara isnat edilebilece\u011finin belirlenmesi gerekiyordu.<\/p>\n
315d(2) maddesinin ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir su\u00e7 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu esas itibar\u0131yla kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, 315d(1) maddesi anlam\u0131nda yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir motorlu ara\u00e7 yar\u0131\u015f\u0131na kat\u0131lan ki\u015fi, ancak yar\u0131\u015f s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki kendi s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f davran\u0131\u015f\u0131yla maddede korunan hukuki de\u011ferlerden biri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak somut bir tehlike yaratmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ikinci f\u0131kra kapsam\u0131ndaki nitelikli su\u00e7tan sorumlu tutulabilir. Ayr\u0131ca, ki\u015finin nedensel katk\u0131s\u0131 ile ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan tehlike aras\u0131nda do\u011frudan bir ba\u011flant\u0131 bulunmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
M\u00fc\u015fterek faillik, yar\u0131\u015fa kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n ayn\u0131 tehlikeli sonucun ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na birlikte neden olmalar\u0131 h\u00e2linde s\u00f6z konusu olabilir. Bunun i\u00e7in yar\u0131\u015fmac\u0131lar\u0131n ayn\u0131 yar\u0131\u015f ko\u015fullar\u0131 i\u00e7inde hareket etmeleri ve bireysel nedensel katk\u0131lar\u0131 aras\u0131nda zaman ve mek\u00e2n bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yak\u0131n bir ba\u011flant\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
Somut olayda Alman Federal Yarg\u0131tay\u0131, san\u0131k P.\u2019nin taksirli davran\u0131\u015f\u0131yla \u00f6l\u00fcm ve yaralanmalar\u0131n meydana gelmesine katk\u0131da bulundu\u011funa h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. P., san\u0131k H.\u2019nin trafik g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye atan sollama manevras\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesine katk\u0131da bulunmu\u015f ve b\u00f6ylece kar\u015f\u0131dan gelen ara\u00e7taki ki\u015filerin ya\u015fam ve beden b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik tehlikenin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131nda rol oynam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. P.\u2019nin kendi \u015feridinde kalmas\u0131 ve ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ara\u00e7la do\u011frudan \u00e7arp\u0131\u015fmamas\u0131 bu de\u011ferlendirme bak\u0131m\u0131ndan belirleyici g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde, sollanan arac\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc olarak kendisine d\u00fc\u015fen di\u011fer y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri ihlal etmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 da sonucu de\u011fi\u015ftirmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
After the two defendants had agreed to hold an illegal motor-vehicle race on the B 229 road near Arnsberg, a collision occurred during the race with a vehicle that was not participating in it. There were a total of five passengers in the car, one of whom lost his life as a result of the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":55580,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[139],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-en"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t